Log In   


 
  
Player Profile for Ryan Amburgy Upgrade Membership
Player ID: 16248-R, OSCO: Oklahoma Scholastic Chess Organization, Claremore, OK, USA
Click Here to View Progress and Achievement Page
Click Here to View Game History

CXR Chess Rating Chart for Player Ryan Amburgy CXR Chess Win-Loss-Draw Pie Chart for Player Ryan Amburgy
CXR Chess Ratings Spectrum Bar Chart for Player Ryan Amburgy
 
Click Here to View Game History
SUMMARY OF OFFICIAL RESULTS
    NOTE: Does not reflect the latest 14 days' activity.
Total Games Reported   (see notes below) 202
Total Games Won 132
Total Games Drawn 23
Total Games Lost 47
Scoring Percentage 71.03%
Winning Percentage 65.34%
Drawing Percentage 11.38%
GENERAL INFO
Player ID 16248-R
Title (none)
Activity Status Active
Rated Status Rating Established
Affiliate Name OSCO: Oklahoma Scholastic Chess Organization
Gender M
Membership Expired3/23/2019
 
CHESS PERFORMANCE PERCENTAGE OVER TIME
Very Short Term Trend Latest 5 Games
80%
Prior 8 Games
100%
Trend
Differential
-20%
Short Term Trend Latest 8 Games
88%
Prior 13 Games
92%
Trend
Differential
-4%
Intermediate Term Trend Latest 13 Games
92%
Prior 21 Games
71%
Trend
Differential
+21%
Long Term Trend Latest 21 Games
90%
Prior 34 Games
74%
Trend
Differential
+16%

NOTES:

Except for "Unofficial Rating", the statistics above are official, reflecting activity which occurred at least 2 weeks ago.

Activity occurring within the past 2 weeks is excluded, as it is still subject to correction and, therefore, is not yet considered "official".

Most of the statistics are not available to provisionally-rated players, and will only appear in this Profile once the player has achieved a Rated Status of "Rating Established". Thus, Highest Rating Achieved, for example, represents the player's highest rating attained once the player has achieved Rated Status -- provisional results are disregarded.

While both Unofficial Rating and Official Rating take into account all results, White Rating is calculated based exclusively on games in which the player had the White pieces; Black Rating, where the player played Black.   The Uphill Rating is based only upon the player's games where the opponent was at least 150 points stronger than the player; Downhill Rating, where the opponent was at least 150 points weaker.   The Regulation Rating reflects results only from timed games where each player had a minimum of 45 minutes thinking time (time control of "game/45" or longer). The Quick Rating is based on games with a time control between game/15 and game/44. The Speed Rating includes only games from game/7 to game/14.  Results from game/6 or faster ("Blitz") are ignored for rating purposes.   Untimed Rating reflects games where no clock was used.

Since these "specialty" ratings are based upon a subset of the player's games, they do not behave the same as the player's Official Rating. For example, if the player wins 6 games in a row -- 3 with white and 3 with black -- the Official Rating might rise, say, 120 points; yet the player's White Rating and Black Rating may rise only about 60 points apiece. Remember that the "specialty" ratings are not meant to track overall performance, but should be used only to look at a particular dimension of play. The White and Black ratings, for example, should be viewed together to determine whether the player has an imbalance -- a weakness playing defense, for example. The Uphill and Downhill ratings should make the player aware of a different dimension of play; is the player intimidated by stronger players? Or inspired by the challenge to play better? Is the player overconfident against weaker players, ending up losing net points in those games? The main point here, is that the "specialty" ratings are for measuring very specific dimensions of play -- not overall performance.

 

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
thumbnail
Website Hosted by Radioactive Frog Web Designs, Inc.
  Copyright © Chess Express Ratings, Inc.